Which CSR strategy is described as being prepared to take full responsibility for actions?

• A. Proactive
• B. Accommodation
• C. Defence
• D. Reactive

Answer: (A)

The key idea being tested is how far a CSR strategy commits to accountability and taking initiative. Being prepared to take full responsibility for actions means not just meeting legal requirements, but actively anticipating social and environmental impacts, preventing problems, and being transparent about outcomes. A proactive approach goes beyond reacting to issues after they arise; it involves identifying potential harms, implementing preventive measures, and openly reporting progress and setbacks. That level of ownership—addressing what could go wrong and owning the results—best fits this description.

In contrast, a defensive stance aims to minimize responsibility or shield the firm from blame; a reactive stance waits to respond only after problems appear; and an accommodative stance accepts some responsibility but mainly reacts to stakeholder pressure rather than driving proactive change. So the description of being ready to take full responsibility aligns most closely with the proactive approach.